Monday, October 18, 2010

new post blues


on the physiology of musical receptivity

what do we know about the way a person
receives music and what can we know about the
physiological response which happens naturally
in the human

call it esoteric madness
call it fundamental hacking
into the intellect
call it theft call it what you will
trespassing
i don't know what to call it
call it anything you want
maybe that's the game
call it anything you want

let me start with the sister whose work is
in physiology
she reported that the human person is
distinguished from other forms of life by a complex
neurological physiological response mechanism
one that can provide a whole host of responses to stimuli

the ear the larynx the lungs the brain the heart
all are activated by musical sound
edorphine seratonin epinephrine
histamines and what not are generated in
wondrous supply by musical stimulation

why in hell's name do we think highpowered musical
extravaganzas are so popular

it is a force of vast social manipulation
based on scientific understanding of the
early 20th century
it is a form of managerial manipulation of people
through the promulgation of electrified sound
it is mind control it is a form of
tacitly and ignorantly agreed upon
coercion it is too late it's all over everyone has sold out
(o excuse me...running off on the type there)

her last name (the benedictne sister in question)is stanley
and i wonder
is she related to ralph
that's what i was thinking about
the monk's last name is pauley
stanley and pauley
the stanely and pauley show

anyway
her work is with electric machines
which provide some access to healing to
patients who have withstood surgical operations
and with patients suffering from
residual pain
she claims to know success
people feel better after lowgrade audible
vibration coursing through the body
like waves of music

the musician expounded the
controversial theory of a french
otolaryngologist
basic froggy eye ear nose and throat dude
one dr tomasin

who discovered that the inner ear
where the little bones are
where the "mechanism" of hearing takes place
is a source of biochemical response
and that this response is activated by
sound
the idea promulgated by both the
brother and the sister
was the fully formed hearing potential
in the womb at 4 months
the connection to the womb what we hear in the womb

mother's voice is the first music

and why babies often sing before they talk
and why music is such a fundamental force of intellectual life
and why cognition often takes place around music
why music is perforce the epistemological ground work
for saying anything
i know because i have heard and have sung music

but of course

i left before it was over
the talk last night
sunday night at the abbey

( i wondered if my endless summer project
would be a matter of didactic concern
for the crowd gathered there)

what am i talking about this once again monday morn
in autumn with the temp now 39 degrees outside

here's what

people in the middle ages knew about the
physiological response of music
they spoke and wrote about how the
body is excited in states of various disease
how mental activity is indeed evident in
what might otherwise be noted as a comatose person

sources
i suppose you want sources
bothe augustine and boethius wrote
treatises on music which allude
to the awareness of profound understanding
of musical power

start there

hildegaard of bingen's music is
marked by an exquisite sense
of the intense chemical high
she must've observed nuns dropping over
all the time
and looked upon it smilingly knowing that
at certain registers there's a fit
bound to happen
when the nuns begin fainting you know
that liturgy needs some rules


jacques de Liege' is a name to note
this guy knew the right stuff
this guy knew what music intends
this guy knew about harmonics and
pleasant descant as a natural expression
of sound which makes people either
shit their pants or achieve something on the order
of orgasm

my point
modern scientific insight is to music
what the pliers is in a dentist's hand
beware be weary be wired be weird

the lute players of old knew they knew
beyond the shadow of a doubt they understood
more completely than any scientist
the mysterious disturbing exhilirating transcendental power
of music
and they saw women throw their undies
(so to speak)

how many women fantasized about being in bed with
frank sinatra in 1955
and why
because musicians have always known
without having to shread the evidence into
harshly manipulated concepts
that music is power

even david knew this with his harp
he tempered the madness of saul

forgive reader(s)
i am in no mood to expound upon the
power of music
i wish only to play the strings and let
the notations falls wheres its mays

nobility attends the musical adventure
only when the musician who wishes to
philosophize about music speaks with his friends
and to this regard the monk and the nun
must be commended
but they failed in presenting not real music
music expressed through the real hands
of real musicians
but they presented recorded music
a piece from a mozart piano concerto

here (hear) again it sounded like muzak
i was offended
it was presented over some very paltry speakers
through the reduction of digital recording
through a computer program through a chip or two
i was so put off i nearly screamed
i was so disappointed so mocked in the very act of hearing
that i nearly staged an open public rebellion
a demonstration against all recorded music
so aware that what i want is the real thing
i crave the real thing i do not want a
plastic representation of the real thing
i want to be able to
make love if only in my mind
with the beautiful cellist or the diva
warbling out an aria of sorts

( i contrast this whole diatribe with the awareness
of a performance earlier in the day
by karen savoca
who sort of made love with us as we listened
and it was well sort of delightful
folky earthy funk
yet she too was amplified
but there was enough in her voice to carry
to the real realm of musical discernment)

i could almost smell her breath

my fury has not as yet abated
i'm still angry at the two presenters
even though they fulfill to a certain degree
the essential requirement for inclusion in the
realm of true musicians known to people like boethius
and (...who else?)

ah well
maybe as i strum my guitar
the fury will recede
and i will accept once again
the scent and the fading colors
of autumn

anon

8 comments:

sally said...

if they had only known
that they could have had
the real thing
some real plucking of the strings
some direct transmission
of sound waves from flesh and nail
of finger on the string
to the inner ears of those gathered

ah well
a missed opportunity

J said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J said...

otolaryngologist

yeah I avoid those quacks.


You probably don't care for Adorno (nor do I really), but he penned a few semi-interesting things about pop muzak (and pop kultur in general), similar to what you suggest--the pop/rock beat itself (and he would include...all popular musick, including jazz) represented a type of inhuman, mechanized drone suited to the slaves of modern industry. I don't completely agree--for one, authentic jazz at times rises above mere mechanized noise, and I would contend the best rock does at times--YET one does note groove beats now pervading everything---malls, TV, movies, radio, youtube. Sort of modern elevator musick (or worse...)

It's usually the urban hiphop thing (honestly, Im really sick of that endless thump), but at times a kind of whiny pop-grunge as well (is that what kids call Emo?) or soft pseudo-jazz. It's nearly ...Huxleyan, in a sense. At some fancy restaurants, cafes etc you might hear classical--sort of snooty Haydn type stuff--but for the most part a sort of smooth sexy 'bot beat controls our consumerist reality.

(scuzi not real poetick)

jh said...

j
my beef here is with the outrageous plethora of recorded "music"
the satisfaction we take with
halfmeasures
the poppification of everything
plastic overproduced sound
it scourges the eardrum

there is a counter movement
the "house" concert is
beginning to appear as a
welcome antidote to parasitic music commerce..maybe buskering will experience a resurgence
i sure hope so

i live in a place where there are
hundreds of musicians well trained classical musicians
any one of them could've produced the musical effects these two people were explaining
but they yielded to the ease of the computer and the sound system
the push of a button

i found it disgusting

those who experiement with electronic synthesized sound do some interesting work

i need to start a project

music is an opiate

{)

J said...

the poppification of everything
plastic overproduced sound
it scourges the eardrum


Yes, I agree for the most part. At the same time we can't all afford a Steinway, or even a Kawai, and some keys-peoples must--at least when they have time away from Trabajo-- be content with Yamahas, or even Casios.

Some musick with electric/digital instruments can be quite powerful--listening recently to some Weather Report, and Zawinul at times got a wild earthy sound with his electric keys/synths, etc.(helps to have Jaco and the rest of course) Really I prefer Hendrix to Dylan.

It's the canned drums, the sampling and full automation that I object to. About any schmendrick can now buy a few warez, turn on his bot-beat, play a few bubblegummy chords, rant and rave some techno-porn BS and produce digital disco in a few minutes.

That said, I agree there is something pure about acoustic instruments--hearing baroque pipe organ played correctly---Voonderbar. Then the same holds for bamboo flutes, really

Bill Borneman said...

To listen is to learn how to BE.

Thomas Mace said (1676) "We would never allow any performer to Overtop or Outcry another by Loud Play; but our Great Care was to have All the parts Equally Heard."

Thinking and listening are the same thing most of the time.

Speaking is almost never the same thing as thinking.

Kirby Olson said...

I like it as quiet as possible. I think music should be a crime. It is against the law to make music in a library, and I think the whole world should be a library. No one should ever be able to play music in public, and there should be no music in elevators, and no music inside of people's houses. Maybe once a year people should be allowed to sing one song just to get it out of their systems. In that sense, I'm with the Taliban. The one place I like music is in church.

however, unlike the Taliban, I do not like beards. They are itchy. No one should be allowed to have beards unless they lived in the 19th century. In the 19th century beards looked great!

J said...

Yo me gustan los catolicos tradiciones que detesten los luteros, y la fea musica de los evangelicos, y que dicen que los WASP-payasos son hereticos. ....Plato y Aristotle son mejor que a El Profeto, y gordo-paysano Lutero, o sinistro Calvino.

:]