i can think of no voice
no writer of the later part of the 20th century
who gives a more coherent critique
of the world of "agribusiness"
and the presuppositions from science
which have determined the growth of food
in our country and around the world
than one "wendell berry"
berry's working theme which reached
it's clearest expression in books like
"home economics" and "what are people for"
is: "the scientific-technological option which has given rise
to the large corporate farming industry has not only undermined
'agriculture" but the "culture" which grows from the
interweaving of a community; the land, the family,
the farm, the interdependency of farmers, the town
the interdependency of farms and communities where trade happens,
and the greater good which derives from healthy communities
rooted in the knowledge and respect for the land-
has been replaced by "land technologists" "earth scientists"
farmers no longer know the land they work
they depend on the bio-chemical determinants
from scientific laboratories
thus perpetuating a "mono-crop" pracitice
which depletes the soil
and necessitates a chemical replenishment
which in turn effects the water and
biological and botanical character of a place
it can be argued that this new scientific method
has done much to increase the yield in places
where a more naturally determined agriculture
brought about less
in some ways the modern approach has
made life for a big farmer easier
it has diminished some of the risk
inherent in any geographically determined place
by this i mean
places like north central montana
where farmers were either beholden to
the weather risks of wheat farming
and the grazing potential of cattle
now with chemical fertilizer
it is far easier to bank on a wheat crop
than gamble with the seasons
but the land and the erosion of chemically laden
topsoil has takin it's toll on the local watersheds
reducing cold streams to little more than
muddy ribbons of strange green growth
killing off much of the natural vegetation
around old streams
and replacing it with fertilizer enhanced
growth that clogs and more or less destroys
the natural flow of seasonal streams
it is safe to place wendell berry in the
modern category of environmentalist
but he is also a literary giant
one commonly overlooked for he has
worked in definite contrast to the academy
novels poetry collections essays
and a few plays have been the media
for his comprehensive and coherent view
his view remains completely local
while not oblivious to the "global" concerns
of our day
berry insists that the work of a man and a woman
are best focused within the community
where a person lives
this sensibility does not challenge the view
of someone like al gore
but to read wendell berry is to become aware
of the importance of being rooted in a place
and to work out the values of conservation of land
and thereby the conservation of culture
within a range that is feasible for the average human
world leaders can articulate visions for the planet
but perhaps all of us need to continually focus our efforts
within the region where we actually live
let us envision places where people live
with a happy dependency on local food
let us practice care for the land
where we live
and while keeping our senses alert
to the concerns of the planet
let us give our lives over to the real needs
that effect our homes and those of our neighbors
this will require nothing less than a reverence
for the soil and the vegetation of a place
before it was marked with the designs
malignant and benign
of mankinds endless efforts
we will have to dispense with the
"enlightment" vision of
"controlling nature"
and return to a "primitive" understanding
of "reverence for nature"
the greater salvation envisioned by
the "environmentalists" of today
will have to be worked out in the
local concerns of people willing to
think about the wisdom "land wise"
people of former days who wove the
patterns of relationship between land
family farm community
the "sustainable agriculture"
and the "organic food" movements
owe much of their ideology to the writing
and thinking of wendell berry
and for this we must be grateful
Monday, October 15, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
i must agree that there
is something elegant
about the natural, native
vegetation of an area
i am thinking in particular
of the coastal sage scrub of
southern California
we have it around our campus,
even though we are far from the coast
sage and buckwheat and yucca
the texture and color of it
is soothing to the eyes
in a way that is unmatched
by any human-made landscaping
it is sad to see it disappearing
we have a local hero on our campus
Kim, a biology faculty member
who mounted a successful crusade
to get the university to set aside
(not just for beauty, but for teaching purposes)
an area of coastal sage scrub
that exists on our campus
i helped a little, by helping her
to make a digital map of
the natural areas on campus
that are used by various departments
to use in her negotiations with the administration
it was a minor saga
lasting the better part of last year
the administration didn't agree
to preserve the land forever
but they agreed to make it be
the last land that will be
developed on campus
perhaps wendell berry would approve
Post a Comment